Wrong. When this … Wrong. When this interview took place she wasn’t a celbrity, in fact no really knew who she was. Second, the reason people love watching this kind of garbage is because the liberla networks have chosen to feed them this kind of garbage. Let’s not bother to ask any questions about her qualifications to analyze poliitics and current events but let’s instead talk about her sexuality. It’s typical liberal idiocy.
lol nah, i think … lol nah, i think it’s just because she’s gay and she’s a celebrity. It’s about supply and demand. People love watching shows where celebrities talk about their sexuality so the shows cater to that to maintain ratings.
The reason the libs … The reason the libs IMMEDIATELY started asking her about her lesbianism was to try to be liberal hipsters and get applause from the audience at how “accepting” they are of homosexuality. The woman is about to start her own show and all they ask her about is her love life? Liberals are IDIOTS!!!! HA! HA! HA!!
nonoo3419
Acorn is … nonoo3419
Acorn is a radical left wing group of federal criminals spending our tax dollars on what?
They are an empowered oraganization supported by radicals like Rachael.
That was pretty … That was pretty terrible. She handled them so well – questions regarding sexuality made me cringe. I think Whoopi and lady next to her were laughing at young blonde chick.
Right wing nutjob comments here are just too weird.
I don’t know how … I don’t know how many times I’ll need to say this. No matter how much expertise, years of study, dedication, etc. you have, it will be tough to win a debate if you follow a failed ideology. The reason I’m ignoring your “facts” and “accuracy” is because they’re irrelevant. Suppose I told you that hamburgers taste better than hot dogs because it’s raining outside. And then I cited proof to you that it was indeed raining, and then called you irrational for ignoring this fact.
Notice how they … Notice how they disallowed a debate because they all know it would be wholesale slaughter of Hasselbeck & she knows it. Instead they focused on Maddows sexuality, as if to try to repulse The audience of her. Corporate media is so predictable. They ALWAYS defend themselves. This would have been the Real thing for Hasselbeck. She’s lucky people lookout for her ’cause we all know Rachel would have killed her. Don’t kid yourselves conservo’ clowns…
It wasn’t just … It wasn’t just education at a “better” school. It is the Doctorate degree in the field from that “better” school, it’s expertise in the journalisim field, and years of study and dedication to poli sci that matters.
But if facts and accuracy don’t matter, as you stated “Give me all the “accurate” information you want. None of it will apply”, then your argument is irrational.
So, either the argument is irrational or in the words of Mr. Wilson “YOU LIE!”
“As usual when … “As usual when faced with accurate information, you’re left with no other choice but to spin.”
There is no spinning. Your argument is that Elisabeth would lose the Rachel in a debate, and your rationale is that she’d lose because Rachel has attended “better” schools than Elisabeth. My response was that levels of education don’t matter when you practice and failed ideology. Give me all the “accurate” information you want. None of it will apply.
Rachel,
I bet your … Rachel,
I bet your parents are very proud of you…NOT
“Big Lesbian Babe”…Big liberal idiot…YOU STAND FOR EVERYTHING THAT IS WRONG IN LIFE!…LAndscaping it to good for you
Keith and you would make a cute couple..he could wear the skirt and you the pants….
On another note: How’s that hopey changey thing going for ya????
How’s that ACORN crap going?
Rachel…God help you left wing radicals with your vision
In the words of a … In the words of a graduate of Eureka college, “There you go again.”
As usual when faced with accurate information, you’re left with no other choice but to spin.
It was a nice attempt at a strawman argument. “educated… supposed to mean,” “Jimmy Carter,” “Thomas Sowell,” you did everything but address the obvious and simple fact that Elizabeth is not cable of holding her own in a debate with Rachel.
By the way, I’d like to also add “humiliate” to the list of highly appropriate words.
Rachel Mad-Cow is … Rachel Mad-Cow is so Anti American I swear she gets a tingle up her legs when Keith Oogleman–whoops—no she likes WOMEN. She goes to bed with a woman and these morons are giggling like sick schoolgirls. Just visualize it. No better not! What has this country come to anyway?
No, “devastate”/” … No, “devastate”/”annihilate” wouldn’t have been appropriate either. No matter how “educated” she is (whatever that term is supposed to mean), she can’t win because she follows a failed ideology. Kind of like how Jimmy Carter went to the Naval Academy and got “devastated” in his 1980 debate against a graduate of Eureka college.
“Collectivism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it.” – Thomas Sowell.
Rachel: Graduated … Rachel: Graduated from Stanford with a degree in public policy, received a Rhodes Scholarship, holds a Doctorate in Philosophy with a focus on political science from OXFORD. She is a journalist.
Elizabeth has a degree in Fine Art and is a commentator on “The View” … Sorry, how could I forget, she was on Survivor. And she like you are so often wrong when it comes to the facts.
You’re right “destroy” may have been inappropriate. I should have stated “devastate” or “annihilate.”
ATTENTION none of u … ATTENTION none of u will belive me or will idk but its verylikely not to belive me i wouldn’t beleve my self lol but has anyone watched the view and seen andy? she makes brownies and she is my moms friend from college and ussally our family gos to luissianna (Spelled rong) lol and celebrate thanksgiving Andie ussally comes over and sleeps over for like a day then leaves and she has a son named matao yep. shes not related to us she is just my moms friend and is famous for her brownies.
I wish they would … I wish they would have let Elizabeth continue to challenge her. Elizabeth is use to Sheri, Joy and Whoopi being unprepared and saying whatever she wants knowing they can’t argue. Rachel would destroy her. Rachel is smart and knows the debate techniques Elizabeth use and would have sent her whimpering to the corner.
Rachel Maddow on the View
Wrong. When this …
Wrong. When this interview took place she wasn’t a celbrity, in fact no really knew who she was. Second, the reason people love watching this kind of garbage is because the liberla networks have chosen to feed them this kind of garbage. Let’s not bother to ask any questions about her qualifications to analyze poliitics and current events but let’s instead talk about her sexuality. It’s typical liberal idiocy.
lol nah, i think …
lol nah, i think it’s just because she’s gay and she’s a celebrity. It’s about supply and demand. People love watching shows where celebrities talk about their sexuality so the shows cater to that to maintain ratings.
The reason the libs …
The reason the libs IMMEDIATELY started asking her about her lesbianism was to try to be liberal hipsters and get applause from the audience at how “accepting” they are of homosexuality. The woman is about to start her own show and all they ask her about is her love life? Liberals are IDIOTS!!!! HA! HA! HA!!
nonoo3419
Acorn is …
nonoo3419
Acorn is a radical left wing group of federal criminals spending our tax dollars on what?
They are an empowered oraganization supported by radicals like Rachael.
Give someone enough …
Give someone enough rope….that was ridiculous.
That was pretty …
That was pretty terrible. She handled them so well – questions regarding sexuality made me cringe. I think Whoopi and lady next to her were laughing at young blonde chick.
Right wing nutjob comments here are just too weird.
I don’t know how …
I don’t know how many times I’ll need to say this. No matter how much expertise, years of study, dedication, etc. you have, it will be tough to win a debate if you follow a failed ideology. The reason I’m ignoring your “facts” and “accuracy” is because they’re irrelevant. Suppose I told you that hamburgers taste better than hot dogs because it’s raining outside. And then I cited proof to you that it was indeed raining, and then called you irrational for ignoring this fact.
What does Acorn …
What does Acorn have to with it? Just curious?
Notice how they …
Notice how they disallowed a debate because they all know it would be wholesale slaughter of Hasselbeck & she knows it. Instead they focused on Maddows sexuality, as if to try to repulse The audience of her. Corporate media is so predictable. They ALWAYS defend themselves. This would have been the Real thing for Hasselbeck. She’s lucky people lookout for her ’cause we all know Rachel would have killed her. Don’t kid yourselves conservo’ clowns…
It wasn’t just …
It wasn’t just education at a “better” school. It is the Doctorate degree in the field from that “better” school, it’s expertise in the journalisim field, and years of study and dedication to poli sci that matters.
But if facts and accuracy don’t matter, as you stated “Give me all the “accurate” information you want. None of it will apply”, then your argument is irrational.
So, either the argument is irrational or in the words of Mr. Wilson “YOU LIE!”
Rachel Maddow just …
Rachel Maddow just needs a COCK!
“As usual when …
“As usual when faced with accurate information, you’re left with no other choice but to spin.”
There is no spinning. Your argument is that Elisabeth would lose the Rachel in a debate, and your rationale is that she’d lose because Rachel has attended “better” schools than Elisabeth. My response was that levels of education don’t matter when you practice and failed ideology. Give me all the “accurate” information you want. None of it will apply.
Rachel,
I bet your …
Rachel,
I bet your parents are very proud of you…NOT
“Big Lesbian Babe”…Big liberal idiot…YOU STAND FOR EVERYTHING THAT IS WRONG IN LIFE!…LAndscaping it to good for you
Keith and you would make a cute couple..he could wear the skirt and you the pants….
On another note: How’s that hopey changey thing going for ya????
How’s that ACORN crap going?
Rachel…God help you left wing radicals with your vision
You’re an idiot
You’re an idiot
In the words of a …
In the words of a graduate of Eureka college, “There you go again.”
As usual when faced with accurate information, you’re left with no other choice but to spin.
It was a nice attempt at a strawman argument. “educated… supposed to mean,” “Jimmy Carter,” “Thomas Sowell,” you did everything but address the obvious and simple fact that Elizabeth is not cable of holding her own in a debate with Rachel.
By the way, I’d like to also add “humiliate” to the list of highly appropriate words.
Rachel Mad-Cow is …
Rachel Mad-Cow is so Anti American I swear she gets a tingle up her legs when Keith Oogleman–whoops—no she likes WOMEN. She goes to bed with a woman and these morons are giggling like sick schoolgirls. Just visualize it. No better not! What has this country come to anyway?
No, “devastate”/” …
No, “devastate”/”annihilate” wouldn’t have been appropriate either. No matter how “educated” she is (whatever that term is supposed to mean), she can’t win because she follows a failed ideology. Kind of like how Jimmy Carter went to the Naval Academy and got “devastated” in his 1980 debate against a graduate of Eureka college.
“Collectivism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it.” – Thomas Sowell.
Rachel: Graduated …
Rachel: Graduated from Stanford with a degree in public policy, received a Rhodes Scholarship, holds a Doctorate in Philosophy with a focus on political science from OXFORD. She is a journalist.
Elizabeth has a degree in Fine Art and is a commentator on “The View” … Sorry, how could I forget, she was on Survivor. And she like you are so often wrong when it comes to the facts.
You’re right “destroy” may have been inappropriate. I should have stated “devastate” or “annihilate.”
Rachel Maddow is …
Rachel Maddow is truly amazing, and full of fun.
ATTENTION none of u …
ATTENTION none of u will belive me or will idk but its verylikely not to belive me i wouldn’t beleve my self lol but has anyone watched the view and seen andy? she makes brownies and she is my moms friend from college and ussally our family gos to luissianna (Spelled rong) lol and celebrate thanksgiving Andie ussally comes over and sleeps over for like a day then leaves and she has a son named matao yep. shes not related to us she is just my moms friend and is famous for her brownies.
oh my gosh.. i …
oh my gosh.. i never seen whoopi laugh that hard on the view.
I’m not sure how …
I’m not sure how Rachel would destroy her though. Because Rachel is wrong on just about everything.
I wish they would …
I wish they would have let Elizabeth continue to challenge her. Elizabeth is use to Sheri, Joy and Whoopi being unprepared and saying whatever she wants knowing they can’t argue. Rachel would destroy her. Rachel is smart and knows the debate techniques Elizabeth use and would have sent her whimpering to the corner.
Ahh man she is gay, …
Ahh man she is gay, I was hoping she was not, but hey gays are cool with me she is hot.
Since when are …
Since when are positive feelings and emotions “nasty”, while hate and bigotry is good? In your own tiny mind?