Before Galileo (about 1590), virtually all of Western Civilization readily accepted Aristotle’s Solipsism — an unsubstantiated philosophical opinion which maintains that the basis of reality is each person’s subjective mental experiences. Solipsists also view the physical realm as the imaginary fabrication of the human mind. Solipsism caused the Dark Ages, because people believed their subjective dreams and hallucinations were actually real. Superstition ruled Western Civilization and very little technological progress was made because everyone believed the church was correct when they taught that the physical realm was imaginary.

About 1590 Galileo discovered that the basis of reality was not the human mind. Aristotle’s "wisdom" was obviously in error because simple physical experiments seemed to indicate that the physical realm was actually real. By the late seventeenth century, Isaac Newton’s mechanics had essentially used mathematics to prove beyond any possible doubt that the physical realm was objectively real. Educated men quickly realized this implied that human subjective mental experiences were themselves imaginary. By the early twentieth century the invention of the electroencephelograph (EEG) proved beyond doubt that all of a person’s thoughts, memories, perceptions, and emotions originate within the neurological structures of their living human brain. It is undeniable that subjective mental experiences are imaginary.

Christians typically imagine that there is some "controversy" about whether the Solipsistic or the Scientific version of reality are correct. This is not true. Solipsism is well and truly dead — proved utterly false by incontrovertable mathematics and rock solid science. The physical realm is objectively real and only an ignorant fool would argue otherwise. In our times, the term "spirituality" is applied to all things of a Solipsistic nature and there is absolutely no evidence which suggests any of it is valid — except within the subjective opinions of those who believe in such unfounded superstition. This explains precisely why religious belief requires "faith." One must accept that which is undeniably false, as if it were absolutely true.

It would be fair to conclude that science has proved the Bible obsolete because, of the two, only science relates to that which is objectively real. The Bible contains only meaningless superstition because the forty men who wrote it were all confirmed Solipsists, who imagined their own thoughts were absolutely real and that everything physical was imaginary.
References :

Science is a way of determining predictable events based on observation and the testing of hypothesis, in conjunction with controlling factors which may have an altering effect on the variable of interest to the scientist. Science can be used as a tool to verify the revelations of the scriptures, or put them to rest as mythology, but it is not fool-proof. Human error in experimental design occurs often.

Science can make the revelations of the scripture obsolete, but as you mentioned in the numerous examples, it has confirmed more "truths" than contradicted them. It should not be viewed as a rival of biblical teachings, but as a means to support faith.
References :

There are so many mistakes and contradictions proved to be false in the bible, so if these are the only passages that people can contrive some sort of real life truth from, I’d have to say that’s pretty sad (For a book that is supposed to contain so much truth….)

Also it’s a bit odd to me that you are surprised by things like them knowing when to circumcise. Do you think they just randomly cut on babies back then, like mindless Neanderthals? There were doctors, things were tested even back then. Humans studied and watched the stars long before the Bible existed. It would stand to reason that someone would assume that the earth was "floating" in space. Come on now, use some logic.

I see you were inspired by someone else’s words, enough to copy them here, but I wonder if you took the time to verify any one of them or think about just how valid the claims are….
References :

the list goes on and on..

and all your ideas that the bible supports science, well those were known by persian astrologers and mathematicians long before the bible borrowed their ideas.

the bible is obsolete.
References :

It’s just much more rational to believe in science as cause/effect than just saying "God did it" in every day life. The explanation "God did it" has become obsolete because we understand things better, ie, Science.

If you believe that the universe created itself in a big bang, instead of the giant guy in the sky creating it, it naturally follows that said giant guy in the sky isn’t really doing anything or isn’t there.

Also, your arguement is based more on bias and individual phrases of where the bible got lucky rather than any kinda coherent point. And if the ancient greeks figured this stuff out, what’s to say it wasn’t common knowledge in the roman empire, who were pretty smart guys? (I mean, they invented central heating. Cmon. That’s good.)

Your arguement also neglects to mention that the bible is also seriously WRONG on a lot of things. Jehovas witnesses, blood transfusions, stoning gays to death (When homosexuality isn’t a choice), etc

Discuss
References :

Do I really need to keep going? Making the Bible look reliable is really easy if you ignore everything else, isn’t it?

A book is not scientific if it’s no use without hindsight.

If the Bible was soooo advanced, why did the Church burn Giordano Bruno at the stake for suggesting the sun was a star?
References :

2)Creation is made of particle, indiscernible to our eyes(atoms, molecules, electrons,…….)(Hebrews 11:3)— Not until the 19th century was that known.

Im sorry, creation is not science, it’s hypothesis.

WHY SPECIFICALLY YOUR GOD AND NO OTHER?
References :